Our recent trip to the sunny Balkans (Split in Croatia pictured) investigated a range of countries that, whilst in geographic proximity, stand each in their own individual realities and in some cases on opposing fundamental trajectories.
We take Serbia, Croatia and Romania each in turn, examining both their investment opportunities and their risks. In short, we see stronger bond investment opportunities in the western Balkans at present.
Looking first at Serbia, the macro-economic situation has surpassed even the most optimistic expectations and overall remains on a positive course. Successful structural reforms, linked to the International Monetary Fund’s (IMF) engagement, as well as a rebound in economic activity as a spillover from core Europe, have resulted in the headline fiscal deficit falling from 7% of GDP in 2014 to 1.4% last year. The government is keen to maintain positive momentum aided by a follow-up IMF deal.
Perhaps counterintuitively, the structural adjustment has not prevented growth from recovering. Higher output is accompanied by stronger performance of the labor market where the private sector is not only absorbing reductions in the public sector but also creating additional new jobs. In 2017, an expected pick up in imports will reduce the contribution of trade to GDP but other sectors will be supportive.
In terms of meeting the country’s financing needs, Serbia has mainly funded itself by issuing local securities in euros. Nonetheless they also continue to develop a local dinar-denominated yield curve and are looking for inclusion in the JPMorgan Government Bond Index-Emerging Markets (EMBI) as soon as next year.
Similarly, Croatia is a country whose macro picture has improved. Growth here has rebounded but, led by tourism, it is of a very different composition than in Serbia. With a current account surplus and a reduced fiscal deficit, increasingly in focus is the subject of whether Croatia will be able to join the eurozone and adopt the euro. While it seems clear that both the central bank and the public would generally be in favour, it is far less obvious whether the political community would be supportive. For those in favor of accession, the main motivation is largely driven by the potential elimination of currency risk for both external debt and indexed domestic debt.
Although there is some uncertainty cast by political infighting, there are more significant challenges that currently present themselves to the country’s economy. Having finally pulled out of a six-year recession, a dark cloud has been cast over the positive momentum by Agrokor, the country’s largest retailer. Through mismanagement of debt, the company is facing a systemic crisis that will significantly impact a range of sectors in Croatia, including the banking sector. Although at this stage it remains unclear as to the extent to which specific institutions will be affected, the impact of the Agrokor crisis is estimated by the central bank to come to 0.4% of GDP.
Tourism has been boon to the country in part due to the misfortune of other tourist locales, such as Turkey or Egypt. Additionally, there has been a structural change in the nature of tourism with better quality hotels attracting wealthier visitors and foreign direct investment (FDI) is strong in this sector. A caveat to this, however, is that the country needs to build its industrial base rather than growing into a Caribbean-style economy which is wholly reliant on tourism.
Romania, at first glance, appears like its western cousins. The country has strong growth and is offered sizable structural funds from EU succession, boasting a competitive economy after years of adjustment post-crisis. However, the current policy mix is negative from a credit perspective and the country currently appears to be a good story going bad.
In theory, the EU’s institutional framework should act as a backstop to limit the pace of fiscal damage and eventually correct the direction of policy change. However, this will prove toothless in ex ante prevention of poor policy until deficit numbers are posted and EU safeguards kick in, if at all, and remains open to political considerations. In the meantime, Romania appears set to push ahead with pro-cyclical fiscal stimulus, which will manifest itself as well in a deteriorating external balance.
Alongside this, poor absorption of EU structural funds stemming from an unstable political situation may put additional pressure on the credit as well as the issue of investment being curtailed to allow for higher current expenditure.
Ultimately, we fear we know how this story ends. Crowding out of the private sector lifts interest rates, which further chokes off productive investment and scares away bond investors. The currency which could fundamentally underperform on account of higher inflation may also suffer from a portfolio outflow wave. Romania’s saving grace is the low level of its public debt – we can only hope this remains the case once its current fiscal extravagance is unwound.
Exhibit 1: Serbia, Croatia and Romania – at the frontier of the European Union
Source: Bloomberg, as of 10/07/2017
Written on 10/07/2017
The value of investments and the income they generate may go down as well as up and it is possible that investors will not recover their initial outlay.
Investing in emerging markets, or specialised or restricted sectors is likely to be subject to a higher than average volatility due to a high degree of concentration, greater uncertainty because less information is available, there is less liquidity, or due to greater sensitivity to changes in market conditions (social, political and economic conditions).
Some emerging markets offer less security than the majority of international developed markets. For this reason, services for portfolio transactions, liquidation and conservation on behalf of funds invested in emerging markets may carry greater risk.